By Aseem Shrivastava | Published at: Jun 4, 2026 11:59 AM IST

High Net-worth Individuals (HNIs) are gradually reducing their exposure to physical gold and increasing allocations to Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs). This is not a sudden shift but a structural change in how gold is included within portfolios.
Gold continues to remain an important asset, but the preference is moving from physical ownership to financial exposure.
Physical gold comes with several inefficiencies that reduce overall returns:
These factors collectively make physical gold less suitable for modern, structured portfolios.
Also Read: What the Buffett Indicator says about Indian market valuations right now: and its limitations
SGBs, issued by the RBI, provide exposure to gold in a paper or digital format without storage issues. In addition, they offer a fixed annual interest of 2.5% on the issue price, creating an income component that physical gold lacks.
This makes SGBs more efficient for long-term allocation and easier to hold over time.
Tax treatment is a major driver of this shift.
While the interest earned on SGBs is taxable, the key advantage is that capital gains on redemption at maturity are completely tax-free for individual investors.
In contrast, physical gold is taxed on sale, with no comparable benefit for long-term holding. This makes SGBs significantly more tax-efficient for long-term investors.
The shift from physical gold to SGBs is driven by efficiency rather than preference. While physical gold remains relevant as a possession asset, SGBs function as a financial instrument that better aligns with modern portfolio construction and long-term wealth planning.
By signing up I certify terms, conditions & privacy policy